A new wave of large layoffs across the country has increased pressure on lawmakers to update WARN Acts at both the federal and state levels. As companies restructure at a faster pace often citing automation, AI adoption, or shifting market demands workers and advocates argue that the current WARN laws no longer match modern workplace realities. Moreover, many believe the system cannot keep up with rapid changes in how companies operate.
Why Lawmakers Want to Update WARN Acts Now
The federal WARN Act has not changed since 1988. It requires a 60-day notice before major layoffs, but many say it falls short today. Remote work, uneven staffing models, and
staggered layoffs make compliance harder to track. Additionally, workers struggle to confirm whether their employer met notice rules.
Many recent layoffs happened with little warning. Tech, logistics, and manufacturing
employees report sudden job losses without clear explanations. Consequently, the rise in WARN-related lawsuits shows how often workers feel they did not receive proper notice. This year alone, workers filed more than 200 WARN suits, including claims against major national employers.
State Efforts to Update WARN Acts Move Faster
Several states are filling the gap while federal reform remains slow. For example, California now requires employers to include retraining and public assistance details in their notices. New York also demands that companies state whether automation or AI played a role in the layoffs. Meanwhile, Ohio and Washington expanded their notice requirements as well.
These state updates aim to protect workers more effectively. However, they also create a complex patchwork of rules for companies that operate across multiple states. Advocates say this complexity strengthens the case for a nationwide effort to update WARN Acts. Furthermore, they argue that workers deserve consistent protections regardless of where they live.
Federal Lawmakers Renew Their Push to Update WARN Acts
The proposed Fair Warning Act seeks to modernize the federal system. It would lower the employer threshold from 100 to 50 workers. It would also extend notice requirements from 60 days to 90. Most importantly, it would add stronger enforcement penalties.
Supporters argue that these updates would close loopholes that allow employers to avoid notice by staggering layoffs. They also believe the added accountability would reduce the high volume of WARN lawsuits. Representative Emilia Sykes, one of the bill’s key sponsors, said the current federal law lacks strength and clarity. Therefore, she wants a version that offers real protection and real consequences for violations.
Legal Disputes Show Why Many Want to Update WARN Acts
The recent rise in WARN litigation highlights major gaps in the current framework. No federal agency enforces WARN deadlines or investigates violations. As a result, workers must sue on their own, which delays relief and increases legal costs. Advocates say stronger enforcement within the law itself would reduce this burden.
Layoff trends show why this matters. October 2025 recorded one of the highest WARN notice totals in years. Yet these notices capture only a portion of all layoffs. Many workers say they received no notice at all because their employer kept the layoff size just under the threshold. Consequently, the need for clearer standards has become more urgent.
Employers Respond as Layoff Rules Face Growing Pressure
Many companies say they want clearer rules as well. They argue that unpredictable business conditions make it difficult to plan layoffs far in advance. Some also struggle to track which state rules apply, especially when
layoffs affect remote employees living in multiple states.
Business groups say that if lawmakers decide to update WARN Acts, the rules should be easy to follow and consistent across jurisdictions. Clear standards, they argue, would reduce confusion and improve compliance for employers and employees alike. Additionally, they claim that clarity would help companies avoid costly legal disputes.
What Comes Next
Momentum for reform continues to grow. State lawmakers are moving quickly, and federal lawmakers are renewing their push for nationwide change. Therefore, legal analysts expect employers to face closer scrutiny and stricter requirements in the coming years.
Workers and businesses now wait to see whether Congress will act or states will continue to lead. Either way, efforts to update WARN Acts will shape how companies manage layoffs in the future and how workers prepare for sudden changes in their careers. Furthermore, the outcome will likely influence long-term labor policies across the United States.
Explore thousands of legal jobs and stay ahead of industry changes—start your search on
LawCrossing today and secure the next step in your legal career.
