A federal judge in Minneapolis is weighing a high-stakes legal challenge from Minnesota officials seeking to temporarily halt the Trump administration’s
aggressive immigration enforcement operation in the state, following intense controversy and protests sparked by multiple fatal shootings involving federal agents.
The hearing on Monday before U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez centered on whether a court can legally pause the deployment of roughly 3,000 federal immigration agents operating under an initiative known as Operation Metro Surge. Attorneys for the state and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul argue the operation has crossed constitutional limits, endangered public safety and violated Minnesota’s sovereignty.
State and City Lawsuit Challenges Federal Enforcement
In a lawsuit filed earlier this month, Minnesota and local governments asked the federal court to issue a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the surge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and other Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agents from continuing large-scale enforcement actions in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area.
Lawyers for the state described the federal response as “completely disproportionate,” noting that the number of heavily armed agents exceeds the combined size of local police forces. They argue that the surge has disrupted everyday life, intimidated residents, and put public safety at risk in neighborhoods, schools and workplaces.
Assistant Minnesota Attorney General Brian Carter asserted in court that the federal government’s tactics including militarized raids and aggressive arrests do not align with lawful immigration enforcement and instead amount to an overreach of federal power. “This administration is not content with the rule of law,” Carter said, urging the judge to intervene.
Judge Menendez Probes Legal Authority
Judge Menendez, appointed by President Joe Biden, appeared cautious and skeptical about the state’s request, questioning whether the judiciary has the authority to intervene in broad federal law enforcement operations. She pressed attorneys on how to define the
legal boundaries of federal action and at what point enforcement crosses the line into unconstitutional conduct.
“I don’t know how you are asking me to identify when the federal government has crossed the line,” Menendez told state counsel, highlighting the novel legal landscape of the case.
Backlash After Fatal Shootings
The lawsuit and broader legal challenge are rooted in escalating tension surrounding Operation Metro Surge, which began late last year. The operation has generated widespread protests and criticism following several high-profile incidents, including the fatal shooting of 37-year-old licensed nurse Alex Pretti by federal immigration agents during a confrontation with demonstrators.
Federal authorities initially characterized the Pretti encounter as a situation in which agents acted in self-defense after he allegedly approached with a firearm. However, video footage appears to show that Pretti was holding a phone when agents wrestled him to the ground, and that a gun was only recovered after the struggle and immediately before shots were fired.
The shooting of Pretti followed other violent episodes tied to the operation and fueled public anger, protests in freezing temperatures, and criticism from local leaders,
civil rights advocates and major Minnesota businesses. Companies such as Target and 3M publicly called for de-escalation of the federal presence.
Trump Sends Border Czar to Minnesota
Amid mounting backlash, President Donald Trump announced he is dispatching Tom Homan, the White House border security czar and former acting director of ICE, to Minnesota. Trump stated that Homan who has extensive experience in immigration enforcement will report directly to him while on the ground, though the precise mandate for Homan’s role has not been publicly detailed.
In a social media post, Trump described Homan as “tough but fair” and emphasized that he “knows and likes many of the people there,” signaling that the administration hopes Homan’s presence will help manage tensions.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt underscored that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem remains in her role with the president’s full confidence, even as Homan’s deployment suggests a recalibration of leadership on the issue.
Trump has also indicated the administration is “reviewing everything” related to the controversial shootings and enforcement tactics, adding that federal agents would eventually depart Minnesota, though he did not lay out a clear timeframe for such a withdrawal.
Wider Political and Legal Implications
The dispute over Minnesota’s immigration crackdown has spilled into national politics. Some Senate Democrats have threatened to withhold funding for the Department of Homeland Security unless accountability measures are adopted, raising the specter of a partial government shutdown.
Meanwhile, local and state leaders including Governor Tim Walz continue to urge a reduction of federal enforcement activity, asserting it has undermined public trust and overstretched local resources.
The federal government, in court filings, has labeled Minnesota’s lawsuit as legally unfounded, arguing that pausing the operation would undermine federal supremacy and disrupt lawful immigration enforcement.
What Comes Next
As the legal proceedings unfold, Judge Menendez’s decision on whether to grant Minnesota’s request for a temporary halt remains pending. The outcome could set a precedent for how courts address conflicts between
state authority and federal law enforcement actions. Whether the court limits, modifies or allows the ongoing immigration surge to continue has significant ramifications not only for Minnesota but for
federal-state relations on immigration policy nationwide.
Looking to stay competitive as immigration law, federal enforcement, and constitutional challenges reshape the legal landscape?
Explore thousands of updated legal job opportunities on LawCrossing and find roles that match your experience in litigation, government affairs, and regulatory compliance. Take the next step in your legal career today.
