A federal judge in Chicago has authorized the public release of body camera footage, text messages, and other key evidence in the controversial case of a Chicago woman shot multiple times by a Border Patrol agent during an immigration enforcement operation in October 2025. The ruling removes a previously imposed protective order and is expected to provide unprecedented transparency into the fatal encounter that sparked national debate over federal enforcement practices and use of force.
Background: Chicago Border Patrol Shooting
The case centers on Marimar Martinez, a 31-year-old Montessori school teacher and U.S. citizen who was shot five times by a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent during
Operation Midway Blitz, a
large-scale immigration enforcement initiative in Chicago. Federal prosecutors initially charged Martinez with impeding a federal officer after her car collided with a CBP vehicle in the Brighton Park neighborhood. The government alleged Martinez had “boxed in” the agent’s vehicle and acted aggressively.
Martinez disputed the government’s narrative, contending that the body camera recordings and other evidence would show she did not pose a threat and that the agent’s actions were unjustified. Her defense attorneys also argued that key parts of the government’s narrative were contradicted by communications from the agent who fired the shots.
Judge Lifts Protective Order on Critical Evidence
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Georgia N. Alexakis granted Martinez’s request to lift the protective order that had kept the evidence sealed from public view. The decision means that law enforcement bodycam recordings, text messages, photographs, FBI reports, and other materials related to the shooting can be publicly disclosed.
Judge Alexakis’s order came after Martinez’s legal team argued that continued secrecy was unfairly shielding the government from scrutiny, especially since federal prosecutors have already dropped all charges against Martinez. The release of the evidence is expected to allow public and legal analysts to independently evaluate what happened and challenge longstanding government accounts of the incident.
Among the newly releasable materials are messages sent by CBP Supervisory Agent Charles Exum, the agent who fired at Martinez. In previously shared court filings, Exum’s texts included statements that appeared to boast about the shooting, such as, “I fired 5 rounds and she had 7 holes,” highlighting the force used despite conflicting accounts of who initiated the collision.
Why the Evidence Matters
Although some of the body camera video does not capture the moment the shots were fired because the agent was not wearing the device at that exact time other recordings will include related footage and audio of the incident, including 911 calls and additional agent recordings. Martinez’s attorney said the released materials will help correct what they describe as a misleading official narrative and provide context missing from earlier public statements.
Legal experts and civil rights advocates have emphasized that transparent access to evidence like body camera footage is essential in high-profile use-of-force cases. Law enforcement agencies have increasingly relied on such footage to explain or justify their actions, but external reviews frequently reveal inconsistencies or details that differ from official government accounts.
Government Response and Controversy
Following the shooting, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially issued statements portraying Martinez and others nearby as “domestic terrorists,” a label that has not been rescinded despite the dismissal of charges against her. Martinez and her legal team argued that the DHS characterization harmed her reputation and public perception and that releasing the footage would enable a more factual public discourse.
The case is emblematic of broader controversies surrounding
federal immigration enforcement operations in cities like Chicago, where local leaders and civil rights groups have criticized the deployment of Border Patrol and CBP agents for aggressive tactics in densely populated urban communities. These disputes intensified as incidents of shootings and confrontations with both citizens and migrants drew national attention and protest.
Charges Dropped and Legal Developments
In late 2025, the U.S. attorney’s office abruptly dropped the charges against Martinez, a move that prosecutors said was prompted by evidence concerns and procedural revelations. A judge later dismissed those charges with prejudice, preventing them from being refiled. Martinez’s vehicle was returned, and the defense raised questions about how federal agents handled critical physical evidence after the collision.
Charges against another individual involved in the incident were also dismissed, and the series of dropped indictments in Chicago has highlighted growing prosecutorial uncertainty in cases tied to federal immigration enforcement.
Public Reaction and Next Steps
Martinez has appeared at public forums and congressional hearings to advocate for full transparency and accountability, describing her survival of the shooting as a near-fatal encounter that demands public scrutiny. Officials and community activists have welcomed the judge’s decision to release the evidence, noting that it could influence public opinion and inform
future legal actions against federal use of force.
The release of bodycam footage, text messages, and other records is expected to begin imminently, with defense lawyers indicating that some materials could be made public as soon as early next week. As the nation continues to grapple with questions around immigration enforcement, policing tactics, and civil liberties, this case stands as a significant
legal milestone in the push for accountability and transparent justice.
Take the next step in your legal career with
LawCrossing. Access thousands of verified legal jobs, exclusive law firm openings, and expert career resources designed to help attorneys find the right opportunity faster. Start your search today and stay ahead in a competitive legal market.
