In-House Attorney Placement, Attorney Resources, General Counsel Jobs, In-House Jobs Search, Attorney Search Placement - General Counsel Consulting
General Counsel Consulting
About us Attorney resources Employer resources Job listings Submit resume Contact Us
General Counsel Consulting
Sign In
Email:
Password:
Forgot your password?
New User?
Signup
GCC
General Counsel
Consulting
provided
exceptional
service in helping
my organization
recruit for a hard
to fill position.
They did extensive
work on the front
end to understand
our needs and
our culture and
began referring
highly qualified
candidates almost
immediately.
 
Melinda Burrows
Deputy General Counsel
- Litigation and
Compliance, Progress
Energy Service Company
LLC
 
Articles By
Harrison Barnes From
BCG Attorney Search

 

 
Click here
 

Career Resources

News from
 
 
Supreme Court Ruling Sparks Tariff Refund Fight

By Ma Fatima | Dated: 02-21-2026

Law firms across the United States are preparing for an unprecedented wave of tariff refund litigation after a consequential ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that invalidated key trade measures imposed under emergency authority. The decision is expected to ignite one of the largest trade repayment battles in modern U.S. legal history, with billions of dollars potentially at stake for importers nationwide.

Supreme Court Rejects Use of Emergency Powers for Broad Tariffs

In its February 2026 ruling, the Supreme Court determined that former President Donald Trump lacked statutory authority to impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The statute, historically used to impose sanctions during national emergencies, was not intended to authorize wide-ranging trade tariffs affecting entire industries, the Court concluded.

The ruling effectively invalidates a significant portion of tariffs collected since April 2025, raising urgent questions about whether companies that paid those tariffs are entitled to refunds. Trade law experts say the decision opens the door for thousands of importers to file claims seeking repayment from the federal government.

Billions in Tariff Refunds at Issue

Estimates suggest that more than $175 billion in tariff revenue could be subject to refund claims if courts ultimately require repayment. This enormous financial exposure has prompted immediate action from law firms representing multinational corporations, manufacturers, retailers, and niche importers.

Under U.S. trade law, importers generally have up to two years to file refund actions before the U.S. Court of International Trade. As a result, legal analysts anticipate a surge in filings as companies move quickly to preserve their rights.

The litigation is expected to focus not only on whether refunds are owed but also on the procedural mechanisms for securing them. Questions remain about whether the Court of International Trade can issue nationwide relief or whether companies must pursue individualized claims.

Major Law Firms Mobilize

Leading international law firms with strong trade and customs practices are already deeply involved in tariff refund litigation.

Crowell and Moring has reportedly filed more than 150 cases on behalf of corporate clients, including major retail and consumer brands such as Costco, Revlon, and EssilorLuxottica. These companies argue that the tariffs were unlawfully imposed and that the government must return improperly collected duties.

Similarly, Sidley Austin has initiated over 150 refund actions, representing clients in industries ranging from apparel and beverages to industrial manufacturing. Boutique trade firms are also handling hundreds of additional claims, reflecting broad industry participation in the legal challenge.

Trade lawyers describe the situation as a “race against the clock,” with companies assessing their tariff payments, reviewing entry documentation, and preparing formal refund petitions.

Complex Legal and Administrative Hurdles

While the Supreme Court’s decision provides a legal foundation for refund claims, the path to recovery is unlikely to be simple. Government attorneys are expected to challenge broad remedies and may argue that repayment should be limited or subject to strict procedural requirements.

One major issue involves how the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Treasury Department will administer refunds if courts ultimately mandate repayment. The logistics of processing thousands of claims involving billions of dollars could create administrative bottlenecks and prolonged litigation.

Additionally, courts may need to determine whether interest is owed on refunded tariffs, further increasing the government’s potential liability.

Trade compliance attorneys are advising companies to carefully document all tariff payments and ensure that refund filings are timely and procedurally accurate. Failure to meet statutory deadlines could result in forfeiture of refund rights.

Broader Implications for Trade Law and Executive Authority

Beyond the immediate financial consequences, the Supreme Court’s ruling has significant implications for executive authority in trade policy. By limiting the use of emergency economic powers for broad tariff actions, the Court reinforced congressional oversight in international trade matters.

Legal scholars suggest that future administrations may need to rely more heavily on traditional trade statutes, such as Section 301 investigations or other congressionally authorized mechanisms, rather than invoking emergency authority to justify sweeping tariffs.

For law firms, the ruling represents both a litigation surge and a long-term expansion of trade advisory work. Corporate clients are increasingly seeking guidance on tariff exposure, compliance risks, and strategic supply chain restructuring in light of ongoing geopolitical tensions.

What Importers Should Do Now

Attorneys recommend that importers conduct immediate internal audits of tariff payments made under the invalidated measures. Key steps include:

  • Identifying affected entries and calculating total duties paid
  • Reviewing filing deadlines before the Court of International Trade
  • Consulting experienced trade counsel to assess litigation strategy
  • Monitoring further court rulings that may clarify refund procedures
Companies that act promptly may improve their chances of securing full recovery.

A Landmark Trade Litigation Era Begins

The Supreme Court’s decision has set the stage for what may become one of the largest tariff refund fights in U.S. history. With billions in potential repayments and hundreds of lawsuits already filed, the coming months will likely reshape the landscape of international trade litigation.

For law firms, corporate counsel, and government agencies alike, the tariff refund battle represents a defining moment in trade law enforcement and judicial oversight. As refund claims move forward, the outcome will have lasting consequences for executive power, trade policy, and the financial exposure of the federal government.

Looking to position yourself at the forefront of high-stakes trade litigation and tariff refund disputes? Explore exclusive international trade attorney jobs, customs law positions, and BigLaw opportunities on LawCrossing today. Stay ahead of market shifts and connect with firms actively hiring experienced litigators and trade compliance professionals.


 
 

Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss it, you will land among the stars.