Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has informed a congressional panel that she has no knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activities or network, offering sworn testimony as part of an ongoing investigation examining the late financier’s associations with prominent public figures.
Clinton’s deposition took place on February 26, 2026, before members of the House Oversight Committee, which has been reviewing Epstein-related records and testimony in an effort to better understand the scope of his relationships and influence. The inquiry forms part of a broader congressional effort focused on accountability, transparency, and institutional failures that may have enabled Epstein’s misconduct to persist for years.
Clinton Denies Knowledge of Epstein
During the closed-door session, Clinton stated that she does not recall ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein and confirmed she had no awareness of his alleged sex trafficking activities while he maintained connections with influential individuals across political, financial, and social spheres.
According to reports, Clinton also emphasized that she never traveled aboard Epstein’s private aircraft nor visited any of his residences. Her testimony sought to clarify longstanding public speculation about Epstein’s connections to global leaders and high-profile figures.
Clinton reiterated that she had no direct information that could assist investigators regarding Epstein’s criminal conduct. Her legal team characterized her appearance as cooperative and consistent with congressional requests for testimony.
Limited Connection Through Social Circles
While denying any personal relationship with Epstein, Clinton acknowledged a limited social overlap involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s longtime associate who was convicted in 2021 for her role in facilitating Epstein’s abuse.
Clinton noted that Maxwell once attended Chelsea Clinton’s wedding in 2010 as the guest of another attendee. She maintained, however, that this incidental social presence did not translate into any substantive relationship or communication with Maxwell or Epstein.
The distinction is significant as lawmakers continue to map Epstein’s broader network of contacts, many of whom intersected through elite social and philanthropic circles.
Congressional Inquiry Intensifies
The House Oversight Committee has expanded its review of Epstein-related records following the release of millions of documents connected to federal investigations. Lawmakers from both parties have stated that the objective is to determine whether systemic gaps in oversight allowed Epstein to evade accountability for decades.
Committee leadership has indicated that the inquiry is not limited to criminal culpability but also seeks to understand the extent to which powerful individuals may have unknowingly enabled Epstein’s access to institutions, events, and social networks.
Clinton’s testimony marks a notable milestone in the investigation, as she is among the
highest-ranking former U.S. officials to appear before the panel in connection with the Epstein matter.
Political Context Surrounding Testimony
Clinton reportedly raised concerns that the
inquiry carries political undertones, suggesting that focus on her testimony may reflect partisan motivations rather than purely investigative priorities.
Republican lawmakers leading the probe have maintained that the investigation is aimed at uncovering facts rather than targeting individuals. Committee officials stated that their goal is to determine whether Epstein’s relationships intersected with public office holders or political institutions.
Democratic members of the panel, meanwhile, have called for a comprehensive review that examines Epstein’s ties across all sectors, including business leaders, philanthropists, and international figures.
Bill Clinton Expected to Testify
As part of the continuing investigation, former President Bill Clinton is expected to provide testimony in the coming weeks. Lawmakers are particularly interested in clarifying any interactions he may have had with Epstein during the financier’s period of social prominence.
The forthcoming testimony is anticipated to draw significant public attention, given the rarity of a former president participating in a congressional inquiry related to a private individual’s criminal activities.
At present, no evidence has emerged linking Hillary Clinton to Epstein’s crimes. Her sworn statement reinforces her longstanding position that she had no involvement or knowledge of his actions.
Broader Implications for Accountability
The Epstein investigation continues to raise complex questions about power, influence, and institutional oversight. Lawmakers have emphasized that understanding how Epstein maintained access to elite circles for years is essential to preventing similar abuses in the future.
The inquiry also underscores the evolving role of congressional oversight in addressing systemic failures tied to high-profile misconduct. By gathering testimony from political leaders and other prominent figures, investigators aim to construct a clearer picture of Epstein’s reach and the societal mechanisms that may have shielded him from scrutiny.
As additional testimony and documentation are reviewed, the committee’s findings could shape
future policy discussions on transparency, legal accountability, and safeguards against exploitation by individuals operating within elite networks.
For now, Hillary Clinton’s testimony stands as a formal denial of any connection to Epstein’s criminal enterprise, reinforcing the absence of evidence tying her to the disgraced financier’s activities while the broader investigation continues.
Stay ahead in today’s evolving legal landscape. Explore top legal opportunities and career insights with
LawCrossing your trusted source for the latest attorney jobs, market trends, and confidential openings tailored to your career goals.
