General Counsel
Consulting
provided
exceptional
service in helping
my organization
recruit for a hard
to fill position.
They did extensive
work on the front
end to understand
our needs and
our culture and
began referring
highly qualified
candidates almost
immediately.
Melinda Burrows
Deputy General Counsel
- Litigation and
Compliance, Progress
Energy Service Company
LLC
Articles By Harrison Barnes From BCG Attorney Search
Milbank has once again pushed BigLaw associate pay raise.
On June 2, the firm announced a new associate pay scale. First-year associates now start at $235,000. Meanwhile, eighth-year associates can earn $455,000 in base salary.
The raise is not just good news for associates. It also tells a bigger story about the legal industry.
This move offers a clear look at law firm compensation, elite firm competition, litigation boutiques, and artificial intelligence. Therefore, Milbank’s pay raise matters far beyond one firm.
It shows where BigLaw is heading next.
With the 2026 Milbank pay raise pushing the market higher, how will other elite firms respond? Breaking down the new BigLaw salary scale and what it means for the industry.
Milbank’s 2026 Associate Pay Raise: What the New BigLaw Salary Scale Reveals About Elite Law Firms
When Milbank announced a new associate salary scale on June 2, it did more than give young lawyers a bigger paycheck. It sent a message across the legal industry: the BigLaw market is still booming, elite firms are fighting hard for talent, and the old rules of law firm prestige are changing fast.
The new Milbank associate pay scale raises base salaries by $10,000 to $20,000, depending on seniority. First-year associates now start at $235,000, while eighth-year associates can earn $455,000 in base salary.
Within two weeks, more than a dozen firms had already matched the increase, and more are expected to follow.
At first glance, this may look like another familiar round in the BigLaw salary wars. But this latest pay hike is more than a compensation story. It offers a revealing look at the current state of elite law firms, including partner profits, law firm hierarchy, litigation boutiques, and the impact of artificial intelligence on associate careers.
Here are four key takeaways from the 2026 BigLaw associate salary increase.
1. Elite Law Firms Are Thriving—and Associates Are Getting a Share
The simplest explanation for Milbank’s pay raise is also the most important: top law firms are doing very well.
In his memo announcing the raise, Milbank chairman Scott Edelman said the firm had been “very busy across the entire firm” during the first five months of the year and expected strong activity to continue.
The numbers help explain why. Milbank posted revenue per lawyer of $2.085 million and profits per equity partner of $7.6 million in 2025. Those figures represented strong year-over-year growth, and the firm appears positioned for another successful year in 2026.
This matters because associate raises are rarely just about inflation. They are usually about competition, profitability, and morale.
BigLaw firms depend heavily on associates to generate revenue. When partners are earning record profits, associates notice. And when the gap between partner compensation and associate compensation becomes too large, firms risk creating resentment among the very lawyers doing much of the day-to-day work.
That is one reason this raise makes sense. It helps firms signal that associates are not being left behind while partners enjoy historic earnings.
The last major BigLaw associate salary increase came in 2023. Since then, compensation for top equity partners has continued to climb sharply, with some partners reportedly earning more than $40 million a year.
In that context, a raise for associates is not just generous. It is strategic.
2. Milbank Is Replacing Cravath as the BigLaw Salary Leader
For decades, the phrase “Cravath scale” defined BigLaw associate compensation.
Over the past decade, Milbank has led every major associate pay raise—in 2016, 2018, 2021, 2022, 2023, and now 2026. That consistency has changed the conversation. What used to be called the Cravath scale increasingly looks like the Milbank scale.
This shift reflects a broader transformation in the legal industry.
Twenty years ago, the top of the BigLaw hierarchy was dominated by old-line New York firms such as Cravath, Sullivan & Cromwell, Davis Polk, and Simpson Thacher. These firms had the most prestige, the strongest profits, and the most secure partner ranks.
Today, the picture is more complicated.
Firms outside the traditional New York establishment—such as Kirkland & Ellis, Latham & Watkins, Paul Hastings, and Milbank—have gained enormous influence. They compete aggressively for lateral partners, dominate high-value practice areas, and often move faster than legacy firms.
Even Cravath, once seen as nearly immune to partner defections, has lost multiple partners in 2026. That would have been almost unthinkable in an earlier era.
The firms shaping the market today are not always the same firms that controlled it a generation ago.
3. Elite Litigation Boutiques Are Now Competing Directly With BigLaw
One of the most interesting parts of the 2026 associate pay raise is not just which firms matched Milbank. It is what kinds of firms matched.
Several of the firms announcing raises are not massive full-service law firms. Many are elite litigation boutiques, including firms such as Hueston Hennigan, Wilkinson Stekloff, Desmarais, Kellogg Hansen, Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, Yetter Coleman, and others.
That matters.
For years, BigLaw was treated as the center of the elite legal world. If a lawyer left a major full-service firm for a smaller boutique, it was often viewed as a step away from the traditional prestige track.
That assumption no longer holds.
Today’s top litigation boutiques compete with BigLaw for the same lawyers, the same clients, and the same high-stakes matters. Many general counsel and chief legal officers are increasingly comfortable sending major litigation to boutiques, especially when those firms offer specialized trial expertise, leaner staffing, and strong results.
Technology has also helped boutiques compete. Smaller firms can use AI, advanced legal research tools, litigation analytics, and flexible staffing models to handle complex matters without needing the massive headcount of a global firm.
This is why the term “BigLaw” may no longer capture the full elite legal market.
A better description might be “Prestige Law”—a category that includes both the traditional large law firms and the elite boutiques competing at the highest level.
Whether that term catches on or not, the trend is clear: elite legal work is no longer confined to the biggest firms.
That raises an obvious question: why are firms increasing associate salaries at the same time AI is changing the economics of legal work?
The answer is that AI has not yet eliminated the need for associates. In some ways, it may make good associates more valuable.
Law firms still need lawyers who can understand facts, exercise judgment, manage client relationships, supervise AI-generated work, and develop into future partners. AI may reduce the amount of rote work assigned to junior lawyers, but it does not remove the need for human legal judgment.
In fact, AI may accelerate associate development.
If technology handles more routine tasks, junior lawyers may be pushed into more sophisticated work earlier in their careers. They may spend less time on repetitive document review and more time learning strategy, drafting, negotiation, and client counseling.
That could be a long-term benefit for associates—provided firms invest properly in training.
There is also a basic talent-pipeline problem. Partners do not appear out of nowhere. Every senior lawyer was once a junior lawyer. If firms stop hiring and training first-year associates, they create a future shortage of midlevel associates, senior associates, counsel, and partners.
So even if AI changes staffing models, firms still need associates. They may hire fewer of them, train them differently, and expect them to use technology more effectively—but the associate role is not disappearing.
The lawyers who succeed in this new environment will likely be those who combine legal skill with technological fluency.
What the 2026 BigLaw Pay Raise Really Means
Milbank’s new associate salary scale is not just about higher pay. It is a snapshot of a legal industry in transition.
The raise shows that elite law firms remain highly profitable. It confirms that associate talent is still valuable. It highlights Milbank’s growing influence as a market leader. It underscores the rise of elite litigation boutiques. And it suggests that AI, while disruptive, has not ended the need for junior lawyers.
For associates, the raise is welcome news. For partners, it is a competitive necessity. For law firms, it is a reminder that prestige, profitability, and talent are more connected than ever.
The BigLaw salary wars may look familiar. But the market behind them is changing.
Cravath is no longer the only firm setting the pace. Boutiques are no longer second-tier alternatives. AI is no longer a distant threat. And associates, despite all the uncertainty, remain central to the business model of elite law firms.
Today’s first-year associates may be expensive. But they are also tomorrow’s partners.
And in a legal market where top partners can earn tens of millions of dollars a year, firms still have every reason to invest in the next generation.
