In-House Attorney Placement, Attorney Resources, General Counsel Jobs, In-House Jobs Search, Attorney Search Placement - General Counsel Consulting
General Counsel Consulting
About us Attorney resources Employer resources Job listings Submit resume Contact Us
General Counsel Consulting
Sign In
Email:
Password:
Forgot your password?
New User?
Signup
GCC
General Counsel
Consulting
provided
exceptional
service in helping
my organization
recruit for a hard
to fill position.
They did extensive
work on the front
end to understand
our needs and
our culture and
began referring
highly qualified
candidates almost
immediately.
 
Melinda Burrows
Deputy General Counsel
- Litigation and
Compliance, Progress
Energy Service Company
LLC
 
Articles By
Harrison Barnes From
BCG Attorney Search

 

 
Click here
 

Job of the Day
Assistant General Counsel
Los Angeles California United States

We are seeking a detail-oriented and proactive attorney with a background in finance, lending, or litigation related to the same to join our legal team. This role will have a specific emphasis on structuring and drafting financing contracts with cust...


Career Resources

News from
 
 
Judge Takes Strong Step to Remain on OpenAI Case

By Ma Fatima | Dated: 09-15-2026

U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona Wang will stay on the OpenAI copyright case after selling her Microsoft stock.

Wang disclosed the investment in a court filing. However, she said she sold her Microsoft shares.

She also said the investment did not affect her decisions.

Wang is overseeing pretrial work in the lawsuit. Meanwhile, authors and news organizations have sued OpenAI and Microsoft.

The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

In addition, Wang said staying on the case serves the public interest. She said a change could require a new magistrate judge.

Key Takeaways

Judge Wang Stays on OpenAI Case

The litigation is known as In re OpenAI Inc Copyright Infringement Litigation.

The case is pending in the Southern District of New York. Its case number is 1:25-md-03143.

Wang is handling pretrial matters. At the same time, the case combines several copyright claims.

The claims involve OpenAI and Microsoft.

The plaintiffs include authors and news organizations. They say copyrighted works were used to train AI systems without permission.

Furthermore, the case is part of a larger fight over AI training.

Courts are hearing similar claims. As these cases grow, judges must decide how copyright rules apply to AI.

Microsoft Stock Raises Recusal Issue

Wang’s Microsoft stock created a potential recusal issue.

Microsoft is a defendant in the case. Moreover, it is a major financial backer of OpenAI.

Therefore, Wang’s stock ownership raised questions about her role.

The judge said court rules would normally require her to step aside. However, she sold her Microsoft shares.

As a result, Wang no longer has that financial interest.

She also said the investment did not affect her work.

Wang Says Staying Serves the Public Interest

Wang explained why she will remain on the case.

According to the court filing, she said staying serves the public interest.

She also said a change could move the case to another magistrate judge.

Therefore, the pretrial work will continue under Wang’s oversight.

Meanwhile, the copyright claims remain active.

What Is the OpenAI Copyright Case?

The OpenAI copyright case focuses on copyrighted works and AI training.

The plaintiffs say their works were used without permission.

In turn, OpenAI and Microsoft face related copyright claims.

The dispute is part of a wider wave of AI lawsuits.

For example, The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023.

The newspaper alleged that the companies used millions of its articles to train ChatGPT.

Separately, several authors filed another lawsuit.

The group included John Grisham, Jonathan Franzen and George R.R. Martin.

Later, those cases were combined with related claims against OpenAI.

As a result, the consolidated case covers a wider set of copyright disputes.

Why the OpenAI Case Matters

The case could help shape AI copyright law.

AI companies use large amounts of data to build their systems.

However, some of that data may contain copyrighted works.

Copyright owners argue that companies should get permission before using protected works.

Meanwhile, AI companies face questions about copyright rules.

As a result, courts must decide how those rules apply to AI training.

The decisions could affect many groups.

For example, they could affect technology companies, publishers and authors.

They could also affect artists and other creators.

AI Cases Could Create More Legal Jobs

AI lawsuits are creating new work for lawyers.

Law firms are handling more copyright and technology disputes.

In addition, lawyers are advising companies about AI risks.

Therefore, demand could grow for lawyers with skills in these areas.

Law students can also watch this field.

After all, AI law is changing quickly.

New cases continue to appear. Furthermore, these disputes can give attorneys experience in emerging areas of law.

Law Firms Represent the Parties

Several major law firms are involved in the litigation.

Latham & Watkins, Morrison & Foerster, and Keker Van Nest & Peters represent OpenAI.

Meanwhile, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe represents Microsoft.

Susman Godfrey represents the authors and news organizations.

Together, these firms show the importance of the case.

Furthermore, the litigation could create more work in copyright and technology law.

What Wang’s Decision Means

Judge Wang’s decision allows pretrial work to continue.

Importantly, her stock sale removes the financial interest that raised the concern.

At the same time, Wang said the investment did not influence her decisions.

The copyright claims will continue under her oversight.

Meanwhile, the case remains part of the wider fight over AI training.

For legal professionals, the case is an important technology law development.

AI Copyright Cases Could Shape Future Law

Courts are handling more cases involving AI and copyright.

Some cases involve books and news articles.

Others, however, involve images, music and software.

Therefore, future rulings could create clearer rules for AI companies.

Those rules could affect how companies use copyrighted works.

In addition, they could affect licensing deals and legal strategies.

As the law develops, companies may need legal advice to manage these risks.

For attorneys, this area deserves attention.

In particular, copyright, intellectual property and technology lawyers may play important roles.

FAQs

Why is Judge Ona Wang staying on the OpenAI case?

Judge Ona Wang will stay on the case after selling her Microsoft stock.

According to her filing, the investment did not affect her decisions.

She also said staying serves the public interest.

Why was Microsoft stock a concern?

Microsoft is a defendant in the litigation.

Therefore, Wang’s ownership of Microsoft stock created a potential financial conflict.

However, she addressed the issue by selling her shares.

Did Judge Wang sell her Microsoft stock?

Yes. Wang disclosed that she sold her Microsoft shares.

She also said the investment did not influence her decisions.

What is the OpenAI copyright lawsuit about?

The lawsuit involves copyrighted works and AI training.

Specifically, authors and news organizations are among the plaintiffs.

They claim their works were used without permission.

Meanwhile, OpenAI and Microsoft face related claims.

Which court is handling the case?

The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The litigation is known as In re OpenAI Inc Copyright Infringement Litigation.

Its case number is 1:25-md-03143.

Why does the case matter to lawyers?

The case could affect how copyright law applies to AI.

Therefore, intellectual property and technology lawyers are watching it.

In addition, the case could guide companies that develop or use AI systems.

What Happens Next?

Judge Wang will remain involved as the case moves forward.

Her decision follows the sale of her Microsoft stock.

As a result, the financial interest that raised the concern is no longer present.

Meanwhile, the wider copyright fight will continue.

As the case develops, future rulings could affect AI companies and copyright owners.

They could also shape how companies use copyrighted works to train AI.

For that reason, legal professionals will continue to watch the litigation.

The case sits at the intersection of AI, copyright and technology law.

Ultimately, its rulings could influence legal strategy and AI litigation.

Looking for your next legal opportunity? Explore thousands of legal jobs and find positions that match your skills on LawCrossing.

See Also:

Quinn Emanuel Claims Victory in Data Center Fight

The post Judge Takes Strong Step to Remain on OpenAI Case first appeared on JDJournal Blog.

 
 

Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss it, you will land among the stars.